Comments for PODIDEA - Successful Intelligence

Comment on Flex Is Not Friendly To REST by Joe

Joe — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:12:35 +0000

If you are using the ATOM publishing protocol for your REST services you could consider using the GData batch extensions (http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/batch.html). This should mean that the information that would otherwise be in the header responses will be present in the XML payload instead and you only need a POST to get all jobs done… Might be worth a thought?

Comment on Servlet Filter Came To The Rescue by Ivan Schneider

Ivan Schneider — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:21:09 +0000

Interesting post. I’m willing to implement a solution similar to yours, would it be possible to get access to the code you mentioned to serve as a starting point ?

Comment on Ten Things Java Programmers Should Know About Python by Arafura

Arafura — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:11:20 +0000

Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation Anyway … nice blog to visit.

cheers, Arafura.

Comment on Ten Things Java Programmers Should Know About Python by Blogs and RSS » Ten Things Java Programmers Should Know About Python PODIDEA Blog

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:08:20 +0000

[...] Did you like this brief introduction? Find out about it in full detail here. [...]

Comment on Ten Things Java Programmers Should Know About Python by infixum

infixum — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:21:11 +0000

IronPython, Microsoft’s open source version of Python based on the dot net framework and designed to work with it, can be included in the production quality versions. It’s actually passed version 1.0.
Some of the modules available in CPython are available in IronPython; many aren’t. In their absence you use the dot net framework equivalents.
I’ve had decent luck with it on small projects.

Comment on Flex Is Not Friendly To REST by fantastic

fantastic — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:13 +0000

Thanks for the suggestion. I believe someone wrote such a class. The work around I came up seems to be working out.

Comment on Flex Is Not Friendly To REST by Nathan de Vries

Nathan de Vries — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 13:07:16 +0000

Your only real option is to implement your own HTTP classes using Socket or XMLSocket. Given that it sounds like you control your backend, serving up the appropriate cross domain policies via XML sockets shouldn’t be an issue.

Comment on Web Application Security by fantastic

fantastic — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:33:24 +0000

Charles,

I am currently evaluating both Acegi and jGuard. Do you have documentation that compares these two frameworks?

Thanks,

Hien

Comment on Web Application Security by charles

charles — Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:15:18 +0000

Hi,
i hope you’ve tried jGuard.
if you’ve got some questions about it, or some issues, the jGuard team will be happy to help you on the jGuard forums.

cheers,

Charles(jGuard team).